New Year, New Look For Kim Kardashian

January 1, 2012

in Celebs,Sexy,Who Gives A Flying F***?

Share

(WIDK) — Kim Kardashian welcomed the New Year with a new look.

New Year, new do: Kim Kardashian showed off a fringe that she had cut into her long brown hair as she arrived at a New Year's Eve party in Las Vegas last night

According to the Daily Mail:

If there was anyone who was itching to say goodbye to 2011 and welcome in a new year it’s Kim Kardashian.

And what better way to do that than with a sexy new dress, a brand new fringe – and a huge party in Sin City.

The reality TV star looked sensational as she arrived at a New Year’s Eve party in Las Vegas in a short white dress that clung to her sexy curves.

{ 13 comments… read them below or add one }

Anonymous January 2, 2012 at 5:34 pm

She is absolutely disgusting, a waste of valuable breathing space, and an all-together useless individual.

Reply

Kimmy Kat January 2, 2012 at 2:03 pm

She should just color her hair blond if she wants to stand out now!

Reply

Daisy d January 2, 2012 at 1:59 pm

her age is showing no bangs will help her look any younger

Reply

person January 2, 2012 at 2:01 pm

all the money in the world wont make you happy, she has to start thinking smart if she thinks shes going to last.

Reply

person January 2, 2012 at 1:54 pm

up shes getting saggy

Reply

Chris January 1, 2012 at 8:57 pm

@Saul – put

Try focusing on one that could actually be involved in your life, eh?

Media, and the muppets that buy into the retarded, wasteful lifestyles of these “famous” morons are probably a significant part of why America has become this way. If people spent as much time working on their own lives as they so observing and bitching about the lives of others, most of these types would vanish.

Reply

saul gabay January 2, 2012 at 11:57 am

Chris, nothing wrong with watching hot people. Gives me motivation to continue to live ;) I just don’t think Kim is HOT anymore. Kind of like Britney Spears and Paris Hilton were once HOT. Kim’s days are numbered. She needs to be thrown out and replaced with a younger and hotter chic.

Reply

saul gabay January 1, 2012 at 6:43 pm

Kim is getting fatter everyday! She’s history, it’s time to move on to the next HOT chic. Media companies please focus on another HOT chic, Kim is old and fat now!

Reply

Kara Alesandra January 1, 2012 at 4:31 pm

@Guy She doesn’t have the talent to be a porn star just the talent to be an annoying valley slut.

Reply

Guy January 1, 2012 at 2:02 pm

It occurs to me that Kim Kardashian could have become one of the most successful and desired women on Earth if she’d just made one controversial decision… deciding to publicly embrace her sex tape notoriety and become a full-time pornstar. Not only would she have become the highest-paid and most popular adult film star of all time, releasing a new “first time” DVD (first girl-girl, first group scene, first anal) about twice a year to major hype and big revenues for a flagging industry, but her existing wealth would have allowed her to give all the income she generated as a pornstar to charity. Her family’s social status would still have made her a red carpet persona, so she’d still get the mainstream attention and notoriety she so desperately craves, but she’d also comman huge appearance fees and draw big crowds at adult film events like the AVN Awards & the Consumer Electronics Show. And if she gave all that money to worthy causes, the only people who would hate her are those still uptight about adult films. Just an observation…

Reply

Jen January 1, 2012 at 1:48 pm

She looks exactly the same. She cut her bangs? Woop-de-fucking-do.

Reply

Jacquie January 1, 2012 at 1:09 pm

She is a beautiful lady but I am really tired of all the Kardashian drama. I really don’t care about any of them or their new looks, old looks, the marriage that seems a fairytale scam, weight loss and gain, I just wish they would fade out of the public eye.

Reply

Reuben Peterson January 1, 2012 at 1:01 pm

What new look? Same fat ass, same plastic chest. She looks like 50 lbs. of mud in a 5 lb. sack.

Reply

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: